Saturday, June 30, 2012

Losing our Independents


Gutted to discover this morning that the UK Independent newspaper will no longer sell copies in Ireland, North or South, apparently due to distribution costs (online link to be added when I find it). Online content will still be available free, of course, and apparently the i will still sell over here.

The response of most people will be: get over it, get online or buy the Guardian. And given that the paper is a private operation, I’m sure that ultimately nothing can be done to change what is presented as a commercial decision.

And to get the online argument out of the way – for me personally, as someone who blogs, Facebooks, Twitters and generally spends more time than is good for me in cyberspace (including reading other newspapers), for years there has still been nothing like feet up with a cup of tea and a copy of the Independent, away from the screen. I shall miss it. Of course there’s a wider public policy argument about digital exclusion, but obviously the Indy doesn’t care about that.

My three points about the significance of this decision are rather different, and they do only relate to Northern Ireland. Should the paper wish to continue selling in the Republic, it may do so on the same basis as other foreign publications, with an appropriately higher price. But, first, in Northern Ireland, we are part of the United Kingdom, whether or not individuals think we should be. This means we share the tax system, welfare benefits (through a parity agreement), and defence and constitutional matters. Our block grant to the Assembly is decided by the UK Treasury. We need to know what is going on in UK politics, and the Independent’s news coverage and features in this area are exemplary. Incidentally their coverage of the eurozone financial crisis by Ben Chu is also outstanding.

The second point is – what will happen to the paper’s coverage of Northern Ireland? Assuming that NI readership will drop without a full paper edition, and given the lack of interest over the water, does it mean that the Independent will no longer provide reliable reporting and analysis in this area? Again that would be a great loss.

Third, it sets a worrying precedent. As times get harder, will other UK newspapers restrict their circulation to more populated areas? Surely it costs no more to transport papers to Belfast than it does to the Scottish Highlands and Islands? Are they next?  And which papers might be affected? – most likely the papers of record. Comments on the Guardian’s reporting of this story today include concern about this.

So in future my cup of tea will be supplemented by the Guardian, a poor substitute in my opinion. 

9 comments:

Belfast Gonzo said...

Their coverage of NI was, at best, sporadic and weak. Most of its sales are inside the M25 and that's where it concentrates. Not that its a bad paper; it always sought to be a bit different.

Peter Johnson said...

Personally I never liked the Independent so this will wash over me.

I like access to my news online. Indeed, it is the ease of accessibility of news provided by the internet that has fired my appetite for reading news rather than just listening to or watching it.

I do, however, feel for those readers who will miss their favourite paper; clearly they'll miss their time alone with an old dependable.

I downloaded the Sunday Times to my kindle a couple of weeks ago and found it quite a good experience. It is a charm-free version of the paper edition but I like news any way I can get it and it's the quality of the writing and the detail and accuracy of the story that I warm to.

Jenny Muir said...

Gonzo - admittedly there wasn't much NI coverage but I always thought that what they provided was pretty good. My main point though is that I do think this is the start of more restrictions to paper-based news content. Which...

Peter - clearly you don't mind! Your comments has had to make me think why I really don't like to get all my news online, and on reflection it's because I'm such a skimmer on the net. If a story is complex, like for example the eurozone stuff, I like to be able to work through it and think about it all on paper. Of course I print out some stories but very rarely. Also I'm sorry but I still won't read the Times - even though I have Sky... I know....

Peter Johnson said...

The beauty of online articles Jenny, just like the eurozone crisis - of which I have learned so much from online - is that I can save articles I read and read them in greater detail anytime I like by saving them to the 'Instapaper' app on my android phone...a tool that is an absolute Godsend.

My Instapaper is full of articles I've read and loved -gems that I find invaluable sources of information and understanding.

And, unlike paper editions, they are there forever. Never again do I hear myself saying, "I wish I had kept the paper with that article in it". With Instapaper I now can. :-)

Jenny Muir said...

I'll look into that, Peter, thanks - although I am still occasionally known to keep real newspaper cuttings!

howard said...

National newspaper daily sales May 2012 (average sale and percentage change year on year)

Daily Mirror : 1,080,544 ; -7.54

Daily Record : 281,465 ; -9.65

Daily Star : 606,641 ; -13.59

The Sun : 2,611,838 ; -8.26

Daily Express : 597,885 ; -5.34

Daily Mail : 1,931,135 ; -6.11

The Daily Telegraph : 575,132 ; -9.57

Financial Times : 300,584 ; -17.12

The Herald : 45,136 ; -10.51
Jenny I think the Independents retreat from Ireland may be a precursor to its disappearance. Many papers are now shrinking alarmingly. Look at the annual change in circulation from the latest figures. Independent circulation fell almost 50% in one year and is now below 100,000:

The Guardian : 214,703 ; -18.34%
i : 274,539 ; 64.33%
The Independent : 93,983 ; -47.60
The Times : 395,752 ; -11.40%
Daily Telegraph: 575,132; -9.57%
Financial Times : 300,584 ; -17.12%
The Guardian : 214,703 ; -18.34%

Alan in Belfast said...

Jenny - the print/distribution costs were probably worse in NI than Scotland. Printing a couple of thousand and then having to pay for a handful to go to newsagents, as opposed to one Scottish print centre running off many more thousand. I wonder whether printing was 'cheaper' (or subsidised) when the Indie was still owned by the same fol as the Bel Tel?

The i is selling quite well. And its journalists are shared with the Independent. so it's potential demise may be overstated.

Jenny Muir said...

Howard - thanks for these figures and sorry for delay in replying, I was in England (where I didn't buy the Independent, on principle). I hope they do go out of business and I hope they rot in hell. After a week as a Guardian reader I'm very unhappy. I think the econonics coverage is particularly poor. But I have rediscovered The Observer as we're going to take only one paper on Saturday in future (Irish Times) and the Observer on Sunday. BUT I have noticed quite a lot of Northern Ireland coverage in the Guardian - is it always like that or are they making a special effort?

Alan - there may well be good commercial reasons for the decision but it makes it no less palatable for the consumer. And I refuse to buy the abridged version if we're not good enough for the full one. On the same basis I am not reading the paper online.

Bloggingbooks said...

Dear Jenny Muir,

I work for Bloggingbooks (bloggingbooks.net), which is the new publishing brand of SVH publishing house.

We are broadening our publishing programme and we have just started in publishing blog posts.
In this respect, we are glad to offer you the possibility of publishing your blog posts as a book.

Should you have interest in the publication of your posts or should you have any question, I would be pleased to answer your queries by e-mail.

You will find more information about our publishing house on our website: bloggingbooks.net

Looking forward to hearing from you.

contact email: m [dot] gorbulea [at] bloggingbooks [dot] de